a question of ethics (in correspondence games)
a question of ethics (in correspondence games)
Hi all:
Where can I find out what is and is not ethical in a corresp game? I read in a article that the use of Opening trees was legal, since it is only a statistical tool, and not a Chess Engine per se. (I was not aware of this).
Where do you all stand on this, and a couple of links on what's permitted would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ram
Where can I find out what is and is not ethical in a corresp game? I read in a article that the use of Opening trees was legal, since it is only a statistical tool, and not a Chess Engine per se. (I was not aware of this).
Where do you all stand on this, and a couple of links on what's permitted would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ram
I don't know a particular webpage regarding correspondence ethics (although surely some exist), but a general rule of thumb is that most anything outside of using a chess engine or outright asking someone for assistance with a position is acceptable - including opening trees, game/opening databases, books, etc. It seems that anything that could be printed material - whether it is actually in that format or not - is acceptable.
Also, you can find several players here willing to take on a computer-assisted opponent, provided they know going into the match that such will be the case.
I've been wondering for a while whether endgame tablebases are legal. Does anybody know? I might have a better idea if I knew exactly what they were.
Also, you can find several players here willing to take on a computer-assisted opponent, provided they know going into the match that such will be the case.
I've been wondering for a while whether endgame tablebases are legal. Does anybody know? I might have a better idea if I knew exactly what they were.
-
- Uranium
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 1999 3:52 am
- Location: NW England
- Contact:
Personally i have no idea what specific rules exist but i would say the use of books and any other source of opening material would be perfectly acceptable
i use two opening books myself more for reference purposes than anything else
as for websites having rules for correspondance chess well i would say visit http://www.iecg.org as there rule list is very comprehensive
i should know this as in my new role as a tounrment secretary with IECG i have to know the rules inside out and backwards
i use two opening books myself more for reference purposes than anything else
as for websites having rules for correspondance chess well i would say visit http://www.iecg.org as there rule list is very comprehensive
i should know this as in my new role as a tounrment secretary with IECG i have to know the rules inside out and backwards
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:48 pm
As to what they are, follow the link below:mluka wrote:
SNIP
I've been wondering for a while whether endgame tablebases are legal. Does anybody know? I might have a better idea if I knew exactly what they were.
Nalimov Table Base
As to it's use, it mainly consists of positions which can be seen without it's use through experience.
As far as I know, it is legitimate to use endgame tablebases (correct me if I'm wrong keith)
Hmm, the official link doesn't seem to work now(?).
Google provided this link which seems to work fine.
spare link to Nalimov tablebase
Don't worry Keith, I won't be using the tablebase anyhow. Unless they would provide the move sequence for:
rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
But that would be something
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 1999 11:13 am
- Location: Jeffersonville, IN
- Contact:
The USCF has their official rules in their official rule book: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de ... ce&s=books
IIRC the only rules regarding analysis was that you could only consult any written material that existed before the match started. But my copy is rather old, and the rules may have been updated to cover databases now.
------
But here's a situation for thought: Say you're playing your favorite opening in one or possibly several games. Are you now forbidden from practicing and analyzing that opening using a computer until you're well into the middle game? What if you've always got a game or two going with that opening?
IIRC the only rules regarding analysis was that you could only consult any written material that existed before the match started. But my copy is rather old, and the rules may have been updated to cover databases now.
------
But here's a situation for thought: Say you're playing your favorite opening in one or possibly several games. Are you now forbidden from practicing and analyzing that opening using a computer until you're well into the middle game? What if you've always got a game or two going with that opening?
Thanks for the links and info!tellymetwise wrote:
As to what they are, follow the link below:
Nalimov Table Base
As to it's use, it mainly consists of positions which can be seen without it's use through experience.
As far as I know, it is legitimate to use endgame tablebases (correct me if I'm wrong keith)
Hmm, the official link doesn't seem to work now(?).
Google provided this link which seems to work fine.
spare link to Nalimov tablebase
Davidswhite and I constantly have games going, so it's gotten to the point where we'll play mini-thematics against one another. I had to make him choose the opening for several matches in a row because I'm playing some postal games and didn't want to risk being unethical. I could just as easily go and play a bunch of blitz games with an unfamiliar opening I'm facing, but that wouldn't feel right either - then again, if the opening in question was already one in my repertoire, I wouldn't have any qualms about continuing to play it in any new games.gmiller wrote: But here's a situation for thought: Say you're playing your favorite opening in one or possibly several games. Are you now forbidden from practicing and analyzing that opening using a computer until you're well into the middle game? What if you've always got a game or two going with that opening?
I'm pretty much surprised about what you all write. I thought help in any form would be unethical. I'm playing like this. If I'm interested in any analysis, I do it after the game is over. This is the way I learn. If I'm interested in any opening, I try to learn it (from books or whatever) after the game has ended (or after the opening is over). I don't learn it while I play it.
My way of playing is a simulation of ordinary chess, where you don't have these little helpers either.
I would like a set of rules or appointments on this matter on net-chess as a general basis of understanding.
And also, I would definitely vote for excluding endgame tablebases. In my eyes they are an instrument for after game analysis. They are no instrument during the game (except for computers), because they tell you the direct way to your win, even if the win is still some 40 moves away. I would not like an email from my opponent asking me to give up because of a tablebase analysis.
Interesting discussion!
Alchab
My way of playing is a simulation of ordinary chess, where you don't have these little helpers either.
I would like a set of rules or appointments on this matter on net-chess as a general basis of understanding.
And also, I would definitely vote for excluding endgame tablebases. In my eyes they are an instrument for after game analysis. They are no instrument during the game (except for computers), because they tell you the direct way to your win, even if the win is still some 40 moves away. I would not like an email from my opponent asking me to give up because of a tablebase analysis.
Interesting discussion!
Alchab
-
- Uranium
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 1999 3:52 am
- Location: NW England
- Contact:
-
- Uranium
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 1999 3:52 am
- Location: NW England
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:48 pm
Here is Wikipedia again, with: FEN Notationkeithstuart wrote:hmm a damn fine link tellymetwise
shame i know sod all about FEN formats i can follow the setting up of the board bit but the last bit is baffling i can follow that b or w represents whose move is next but the rest is totally unknown
It explains those last parts of the code.
-
- Uranium
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 1999 3:52 am
- Location: NW England
- Contact:
Re: a question of ethics (in correspondence games)
does it count as a rule-breaker here if someone supposingly is playing himself under the different accounts? thanks,
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: a question of ethics (in correspondence games)
I've seen clone accounts play each other with a whole bunch of Fool's Mates for the purpose of giving the new account an accurate and established rating. You could use a few accounts to boost your rating up to 3000, but there would be no point in having an artificial rating.
From what I've read on Chess.com's Cheating Forum the use of endgame databases is not allowed and is considered cheating. I am unsure about endgame books, but I believe they are allowed.
From what I've read on Chess.com's Cheating Forum the use of endgame databases is not allowed and is considered cheating. I am unsure about endgame books, but I believe they are allowed.