It would be very interesting to have another Human vs Computer match, i think. Perhaps we could all play the computer, by voting on the moves we like and the most popular move gets played. Simular games have been played, like "Kasparov Vs The World". Kasparov had alot of trouble winning that game, it was only in move 51 "the world" made its losing mistake. (check out
http://classic.zone.msn.com/Kasparov/movelist.html)
Maybe we could beat the computer!
What do you think Greg, is this possible on net-chess.com?
mberggren
Lets play a game for the human race!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 1999 11:13 am
- Location: Jeffersonville, IN
- Contact:
What Microsoft didn't publicize durring that match is that they couldn't tell the difference between a single voter, and someone registering under 500 different accounts and voting for "bad" moves. And at one point they refused to accept the move which received the most votes, which would have immediatley lost the game.
I'm not against another man vs. machine match, but one where people vote won't be practical.
I'm not against another man vs. machine match, but one where people vote won't be practical.
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:48 pm
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 8:16 am
tellymetwise wrote:
That of course depends on the computer. But anyway, I read somewhere that in the year 2050 the game of chess will be solved, if the increase in computerpower continues at the same rate as the last 30 years.How deep can a computer compute after a day?
21 moves like arlowc discoverd?
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:48 pm